Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.
Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 12-1288 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
muiteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI qrircuit
CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, AND
WILLIAM L. KOSS, Counterclaim Defendant, v. MILLER VENEERS, INC., Defendant / Counterclaimant-Appellee, AND THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellees.
2012-1288
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in case no. 09-CV-0702, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Case: 12-1288 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2012
CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. V. MILLER VENEERS, INC. 2
ON MOTION
ORDER Miller Veneers et al. (Miller Veneers) move for leave to file a surreply brief, with surreply brief attached, to address arguments they assert were raised by Capital Machine Company, Inc. and Indiana Forge, LLC ("Capital Machine") for the first time in their reply brief. Capital Machine opposes or in the alternative moves for leave to file a sur- surreply. Miller Veneers replies. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are denied.
FOR THE COURT
SEP 25 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Michael A. Swift, Esq. Paul B. Overhauser, Esq. James L. McNeely, Esq. COUJ~~EALS u.s.THE FEDERAl. CIRCUITFOR s25 SEP 25 ZUll JAN HORBALY CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished