U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Dist.

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Dist.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 28, 2012

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Dist.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit METSO MINERALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, V. POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION, LIMITED, NOW KNOWN AS TEREX GB LIMITED, POWERSCREEN NEW YORK, INC., AND EMERALD EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND TEREX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

2011-1572, 2012-1 168, -1169 Appeals from the United States District C0urt for the Eastern District of New Y0rk in case no. ()6-CV-1446, Judge Arthur D. Spatt.

ON MOTION Bef0re DYK, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R METSO MINERALS V. POWERSCREEN INTL 2 Metso Minera1s, Inc. moves for leave to file two sepa- rate response briefs or, in the alternative, to file an ex- tended response brief of up to 23,000 Words. Powerscreen International Distribution, Limited, Powerscreen New York, Inc., Emerald Equipment Systems. Inc. and Terex Corporation oppose the motion to file two separate re- sponse briefs but consent to the motion to file an extended response brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are denied. Metso Minerals, Inc.’s brief, not to exceed 14,000 Words, is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

FoR THE CoURT SEF 2 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Michael C. Stuart, Esq. mg Jon R. Trembath, Esq. MUIE A'- C\RCW Vincent Alfieri, Esq. SEp 2 8 2012 $26 JANuoaamv CLERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.