NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

SYNQOR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ASTEC AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellants,

AND

BEL FUSE, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

AND

DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC., DELTA PRODUCTS CORP., AND POWER-0NE, INC., Defendants-Appellants,

AND

MURATA ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC., MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND MURATA POWER SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

AND

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND LINEAGE POWER CORP., Defendants.

SYNQOR V. ARTESYN TECH 2

2011-1191, -1192, -1194, 2012-1070, -1071, -1072

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-0497, Judge T. John Ward.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM. 0 R D E R

The appellants move for clarification of the court’s April 11, 2011 order and expedited consideration. Syn- Qor, Inc. opposes. The parties also submit status reports in light of this court’s September 15, 2011 order.

The parties note that SynQor has initiated an action against the appellants regarding post-injunction royalties and/or damages, and contend that this motion is relevant to resolving some of the issues in that action. This court notes that the post-injunction proceedings remain pend- ing before the United States District Court for the East- ern District of Texas.

g We deem it the better course to deny the motion and for all issues regarding contempt of the injunction and damages to be addressed by the Eastern District of Texas in the first instance.

Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

The motion for clarification is denied.

CCI

s19

OCT 05 2012

Date

Donald R. Dunner, Esq. Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq. AndreW J. Pincus, Esq.

Alan D. Smith, Esq.

Eric W. Benisek, Esq. William F. Lee, Esq.

sYNQoR v. ARTESYN TECH FoR THE CoURT

/s/ J an Horbaly J an Horba1y

Clerk

U$~

OCT 05 2012 JANHORBAL C£E%K y

msron mFsoenALcxncun