Pulungan v. United States
Pulungan v. United States
Opinion
Case: 12-5110 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mUlteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!CIrcuit
DOLI SYARIEF PULUNGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
2012-5110
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 11-CV-193, Senior Judge James F. Merow.
ON MOTION
Before LINN, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
ORDER The United States moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Doli Pulungan has not filed a re- sponse. Case: 12-5110 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 10/16/2012
DOLI PULUNGAN v. US 2
In March 2008, Pulungan filed an appeal in the United States Court of Federal Claims. On November 15, 2011, the court dismissed Pulungan's claim for lack of jurisdiction and entered final judgment. The court re- ceived Pulungan's notice of appeal on July 6, 2012, 234 days after the date of judgment. Rule 4(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Pro- cedure govern the time for filing a notice of appeal from a judgment of the Court of Federal Claims. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); see also Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. U.S., 716 F.2d 1395, 1396 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims to this court is jurisdictional and mandatory. See Sofarelli, 716 F.2d at 1396; see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 213-14 (2007). We have no authority to create equitable excep- tions for untimely notices of appeal. Id. Because this appeal is untimely, we grant the motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. (2) All other pending motions are denied as moot. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
OCT 1 6 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk Case: 12-5110 Document: 14 Page: 3 Filed: 10/16/2012
3 DOLI PULUNGAN v. US
cc: Doli Syarief Pulungan Sonia Marie Orfield, Esq. s26
Issued As A Mandate: __O_C_T_1_6 _2_01_2-,--_
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished