Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees,

AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

2012-1172

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION

ORDER

AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corpo- ration America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

OCT 19 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Donald R. McPhail, Esq. FILED Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. u.s.THE FEDEfl~l CIRCUITFOn COURT OF APPEALS

OCT 19 ZU'IL s24 JANHORBAlY a.ERK

Reference

Status
Unpublished