Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.
2012-1172
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION
ORDER AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corpo- ration America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief.
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
OCT 19 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq.
Donald R. McPhail, Esq. FILED Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. u.s.THE FEDEfl~l CIRCUITFOn COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 ZU'IL s24 JANHORBAlY a.ERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.