U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided October 19, 2012

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

2012-1172

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.

Robinson.

APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION

ORDER AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corpo- ration America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

OCT 19 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq.

Donald R. McPhail, Esq. FILED Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. u.s.THE FEDEfl~l CIRCUITFOn COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 ZU'IL s24 JANHORBAlY a.ERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.