Costantino v. Sheilz
Costantino v. Sheilz
Opinion
Case: 12-1511 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb $>tate~ qcourt of §ppeaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!ircuit FRANCESCA COSTANTINO, ROBERTO LENNA, AND SILVIA PIURI, Appellants, v. CARSTEN SEILZ AND HARTMUT SEBA, Appellees.
2012-1511 (Interference No. 105,788)
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board f Patent Appeals and Interferences.
ON MOTION
ORDER The parties jointly move for Carstein Seilz and Hart- mut Seba to have a 14-day extension of time, until No- vember 16, 2012, to file their response brief, and for Francesca Costantino, Roberto Lenna and Silvia Piuri to have a 9-day extension of time, until December 12, 2012, to file their reply brief.
Case: 12-1511 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2012
FRANCESCA COSTANTINO V. CARSTEN SEILZ 2
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s27
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.