Wyeth and Cordis v. Abbott Laboratories
Wyeth and Cordis v. Abbott Laboratories
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb $)tates QCourt of §ppeaIs for toe jfeberaI QCircuit
WYETH AND CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,
v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., MEDTRONIC INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., AND MEDTRONIC USA, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellees,
AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants- Appellees.
2012-1223, -1224
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case nos. 08-CV-0230 and 08- CV-1021, Judge Joel A. Pisano. WYETH v. ABBOTT LABS 2
ON MOTION
Before RADER, Chief Judge.
ORDER Wyeth and Cordis Corporation ("Appellants") have filed two motions: 1) a motion for leave to file an extended reply brief not to exceed 11,000 words; and 2) a motion for leave to file an extended reply brief not to exceed 9,000 words. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scien- tific Scimed Inc. oppose the first motion and consent to the second motion.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motions are granted to the extent that Appellants may file a reply brief not to exceed 9,000 words.
FOR THE COURT
HOV 14 2m2 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: David T. Pritikin, Esq. Edward A. Mas, II, Esq. fiLED . COlIIT.Of APPEALS rOo Matthew M. Wolf, Esq. UJ.~ FEDERAL r,mCIlIT Samuel F. Baxter, Esq. NOV 14 ZUff s25 JANHORBAlV a.en<
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished