Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtniteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit
APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees,
AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.
2012-1172
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2
ON MOTION
ORDER Upon consideration of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corpo- ration and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA's (collectively "CMO") motion for a one-month extension of time, until December 5, 2012, to file their response brief,
IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. CMO's response brief is due no later than December 5,2012.
FOR THE COURT
NOV 28 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. U.s. COURf~~~EALS FOR THE FEDEP.~'. r.'tlCUIT Donald R. McPhail, Esq. NOV 28 Z012 s25 JAN HORBALY CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished