U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 28, 2012

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtniteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

2012-1172

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.

Robinson.

APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2

ON MOTION

ORDER Upon consideration of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corpo- ration and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA's (collectively "CMO") motion for a one-month extension of time, until December 5, 2012, to file their response brief, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. CMO's response brief is due no later than December 5,2012.

FOR THE COURT

NOV 28 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq.

Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. U.s. COURf~~~EALS FOR THE FEDEP.~'. r.'tlCUIT Donald R. McPhail, Esq.

NOV 28 Z012 s25 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.