Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
Case: 12-1620 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtntteb ~tate11 {!Court of ~peaI11 for tbe jfeberaI qctrcutt
LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Appellant,
v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
AND FUJIAN HONGAN ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. AND ZHEJIANG TRIMONE ELECTRIC SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Intervenors.
2012-1483
On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739.
FUJIAN HONGAN ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. AND ZHEJIANG TRIMONE ELECTRIC SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellants,
v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, Case: 12-1620 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 11/30/2012
HUBBELL INCORPORATED V. ITC 2
AND
LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Intervenor.
2012-1493
On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739.
HUBBELL INCORPORATED, Appellant,
v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
AND LEVITON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Intervenor.
2012-1620
On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739.
ON MOTION
ORDER Case: 12-1620 Document: 36 Page: 3 Filed: 11/30/2012
3 HUBBELL INCORPORATED V. ITC
Intervenor Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of standing. Hubbell Incorporated opposes, arguing it has standing to pursue this appeal. The International Trade Commission supports the motion. The Commission also moves to strike Hubbell's reply to the Commission's response to Leviton's motion to strike, or alternatively for leave to file a sur- reply.
We deem it the better course to deny the motion to dismiss and for the parties to put these jurisdictional arguments in their briefs.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss is denied.
(2) All other motions are moot.
(3) This appeal, along with Appeal Nos. 2012-1483, Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. lTC, and 2012-1493, Fujian Hongan Electric Co. v. lTC, are designated companion cases for purposes of oral argument, and will be argued consecutively before the same merits panel.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s23
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished