Bright Response, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Bright Response, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mniteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit
BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLARIS IP, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant-Appellant.
2012-1045, 2013-XXXX
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-0371, Magis- trate Judge Charles Everingham.
ON MOTION
ORDER The parties jointly move to lift the stay of the briefing schedule and to consolidate this appeal with a related appeal which has been filed in the district court but not yet received or docketed by this court. The undocketed appeal is an appeal from the district court's final judgment on the issue of inequitable conduct. BRIGHT RESPONSE v. YAHOO 2
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to consolidate is granted. When the appeal of the inequitable conduct order is docketed, it shall be consolidated with appeal no. 2012-1045. (2) The motion to lift the stay of the briefing schedule is granted. The appellant's opening brief is due 60 days from the date of this court's docketing of the appeal concerning inequitable conduct.
FOR THE COURT
DEC 1 1 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Andrew D. Weiss, Esq. Jason C. White, Esq. FILED U.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR s25 THE FEDER!\l r.mr.ulT DEC 11 ZU1Z JAN HORBAlY CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished