Securities and Exchange Commission v. Onyx Capital Advisors
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Onyx Capital Advisors
Opinion
Case: 13-1110 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 12/26/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC AND MICHAEL A. FARR, Defendants,
AND
ROY DIXON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________
2013-1110 __________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in case no. 10-CV-11633, Judge Denise Page Hood. __________________________
ORDER
The court considers whether this appeal should be dis- missed or transferred.
Roy Dixon, Jr. appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan which granted summary judgment in favor of the Securi- Case: 13-1110 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 12/26/2012
SEC V. ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS 2
ties and Exchange Commission for violations of the Secu- rities Act and the Exchange Act it found that Dixon committed. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not appear to include jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The parties are directed to respond within 14 days from the date of filing of this order concerning whether this appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
s26
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished