U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 28, 2012 · Dyk
482 F. App'x 592

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd.

Opinion of the Court

*593ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Metso Minerals, Inc. moves for leave to file two separate response briefs or, in the alternative, to file an extended response brief of up to 23,000 words. Powerscreen International Distribution, Limited, Pow-erscreen New York, Inc., Emerald Equipment Systems. Inc. and Terex Corporation oppose the motion to file two separate response briefs but consent to the motion to file an extended response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

It is Ordered that:

The motions are denied. Metso Minerals, Inc.’s brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.