NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees,

AND

CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. ______________________

2012-1172, -1173 ______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

SCOTT G. SEIDMAN, Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, of Portland, Oregon argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief were JON P. STRIDE and DON H. MARMADUKE.

LAWRENCE J. GOTTS, Latham & Watkins LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees AU Optronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was ELIZABETH M. ROESEL. Of counsel on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, PETER J. WIED and JAY C. CHIU, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, Cali- fornia.

DONALD R. MCPHAIL, Cozen O’Connor, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Chi Mei Optoelec- tronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was BARRY GOLOB. Of counsel was KRISTINA CAGGIANO, Duane Morris, LLP, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk