Porter v. Navy
Porter v. Navy
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CELESTINE PORTER, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. ______________________
2013-3013 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC0752120092-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MORRIS E. FISCHER, Law Office of Morris E. Fischer, of Silver Spring, Maryland, argued for petitioner.
PHYLLIS JO BAUNACH, Trial Attorney, Commercial Lit- igation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Principal Deputy Assis- tant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director, and JANE C. DEMPSEY, Trial Attorney. Of counsel was TRACEY ROCKENBACH, Naval Litigation Office, United States Department of Navy, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished