NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AND YAHOO! INC., Defendants-Appellees,

AND

GOOGLE INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees,

AND

J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2012-1632 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0446, Chief Judge Leonard Davis. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MIKE MCKOOL JR., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY, of Dallas, Texas, and KEVIN L. BURGESS, JOHN B. CAMPBELL and JOEL L. THOLLANDER, of Austin, Texas.

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was ADAM CONRAD, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kaso- witz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc., et al.; DIANE K. LETTELLEIR, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Plano, Texas, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, and JENNIFER H. DOAN, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, Texas, for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; KEVIN T. KRAMER, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, for defendant- appellee, Amazon.com, Inc. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges). 3

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 22, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk