Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox), Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W. BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________

2013-1112 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME.

EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished