Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.
Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox), Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W. BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________
2013-1112 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME.
EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished