Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.
Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Bibow Industries, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W.
BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2013-1112 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME.
EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.