Insituform Technologies v. Amerik Supplies, Inc.
Insituform Technologies v. Amerik Supplies, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND INA ACQUISITION CORP., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR Trading U.S.A., Inc.) AND ERIK NIELSEN, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees,
v.
COSMIC-SONDERMASCHINENBAU GMBH, Third Party Defendant-Appellant. ______________________
2012-1655, -1656 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 08-CV-0333, Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DEAN L. FRANKLIN, Thompson Coburn LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were ALAN H. NORMAN, MICHAEL L. NEPPLE and MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL.
DANIEL A. KENT, Kent Law, P.C., of Alpharetta, Geor- gia, argued for third party defendant-appellant. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished