NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: PRICEPLAY, INC. ______________________

2013-1102 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/009,444. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

SCOTT M. DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Appellant. With him on the brief was DARRIN A. AUITO.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk