NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: PRICEPLAY, INC. ______________________ 2013-1102 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/009,444. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ SCOTT M. DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Appellant.

With him on the brief was DARRIN A. AUITO.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk