Thomas v. Pippin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Thomas v. Pippin

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS AND ALAN E. THOMAS, Appellants,

v.

JACK D. PIPPIN, Appellee. ______________________

2013-1142, -1143, -1144 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interfer- ence No. 105,801, 105, 802, 105, 803. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

C. DOUGLASS THOMAS, IpVenture, Inc., of Los Altos, California, argued for appellants.

WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING, DONALD R. STEINBERG and ERIC FLETCHER; and WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN and CAROLYN JACOBS CHACHKIN, of Washing- ton, DC. Of counsel were R. DANNY HUNTINGTON and WILLIAM N. HIGHET, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 15, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished