NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P. ______________________ 2013-1139 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/010,130. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Vir- ginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JONATHAN G. GRAVES, OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, AND LORI R. MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.

STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and Thomas W.

Krause, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 7, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court