NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., ______________________

2013-1137 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/008,057. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Vir- ginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JONATHAN G. GRAVES, of Reston, Virginia, and LORI R. MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 7, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court