Camille Caesar v. Commerce
Camille Caesar v. Commerce
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CAMILLE M. CAESAR, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.
______________________
2012-3125 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case No. DC0752100394-1-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
EDWARD HAROLD PASSMAN, Passman & Kaplan, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
JANE W. VANNEMAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commer- cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director. Of counsel was HILLARY STERN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished