Camille Caesar v. Commerce

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Camille Caesar v. Commerce

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CAMILLE M. CAESAR, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.

______________________

2012-3125 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case No. DC0752100394-1-1. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

EDWARD HAROLD PASSMAN, Passman & Kaplan, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

JANE W. VANNEMAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commer- cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director. Of counsel was HILLARY STERN. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished