U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Camille Caesar v. Commerce

Camille Caesar v. Commerce
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 8, 2013

Camille Caesar v. Commerce

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAMILLE M. CAESAR, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.

______________________ 2012-3125 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case No. DC0752100394-1-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EDWARD HAROLD PASSMAN, Passman & Kaplan, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

JANE W. VANNEMAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commer- cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F.

DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director. Of counsel was HILLARY STERN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.