Advanced Technology v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Advanced Technology v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND

BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant,

AND

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. ______________________ 2013-1305 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. HOLTON, and STEPHEN W. BROPHY.

DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. Of counsel was TESSA V. CAPELOTO. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished