Advanced Technology v. United States
Advanced Technology v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
AND
BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
AND
DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee,
AND
WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. ______________________ 2013-1305 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. HOLTON, and STEPHEN W. BROPHY.
DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. Of counsel was TESSA V. CAPELOTO. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished