Advanced Technology v. United States
Advanced Technology v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, AND BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AND DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee, AND WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. ______________________ 2013-1305 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. HOLTON, and STEPHEN W. BROPHY.
DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. Of counsel was TESSA V. CAPELOTO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.