Nextec Applications v. Brookwood Companies
Nextec Applications v. Brookwood Companies
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
NEXTEC APPLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant. ______________________
2012-1670, -1685 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-6901, Senior Judge Thomas P. Griesa. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
NAGENDRA SETTY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, EDWARD V. ANDERSON, and MICHAEL MURPHY. Of counsel was DANIEL NICHOLAS YANNUZZI, of San Diego, California.
DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were KAREN F. GROHMAN; ADAM M. CONRAD, of Charlotte, North Carolina; ETHAN HORWITZ, of New York, New York; and MARY KATHERINE BATES, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, Chief Judge, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished