Nextec Applications v. Brookwood Companies

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Nextec Applications v. Brookwood Companies

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NEXTEC APPLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant. ______________________

2012-1670, -1685 ______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-6901, Senior Judge Thomas P. Griesa. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

NAGENDRA SETTY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, EDWARD V. ANDERSON, and MICHAEL MURPHY. Of counsel was DANIEL NICHOLAS YANNUZZI, of San Diego, California.

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were KAREN F. GROHMAN; ADAM M. CONRAD, of Charlotte, North Carolina; ETHAN HORWITZ, of New York, New York; and MARY KATHERINE BATES, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, Chief Judge, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished