Madstad Engineering, Inc. v. PTO
Opinion
Case: 13-1512 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 11/19/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MADSTAD ENGINEERING, INC. AND MARK
STADNYK,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE, TERESA STANEK REA, ACTING
DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND
TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES,
Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2013-1512 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 12-CV-1589, Judge Steven D. Merryday. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER
Upon consideration of the United States’ unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal as erroneously docketed, Case: 13-1512 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 11/19/2013
2 MADSTAD ENGINEERING, INC. v. PTO
IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s25
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 19, 2013
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.