U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Madstad Engineering, Inc. v. PTO

Madstad Engineering, Inc. v. PTO
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 19, 2013
Madstad Engineering, Inc. v. PTO

Opinion

Case: 13-1512 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 11/19/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MADSTAD ENGINEERING, INC. AND MARK

STADNYK,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE, TERESA STANEK REA, ACTING

DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND

TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES,

Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2013-1512 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 12-CV-1589, Judge Steven D. Merryday. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER

Upon consideration of the United States’ unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal as erroneously docketed, Case: 13-1512 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 11/19/2013

2 MADSTAD ENGINEERING, INC. v. PTO

IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s25

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 19, 2013

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.