Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank
Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank
Opinion
Case: 13-1626 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JAMES E. ZABLOSKY AND KAREN ZABLOSKY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MIDFIRST BANK AND MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-1626 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 13-CV-0467, Senior Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth. ______________________
PER CURIAM. ORDER The court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed. Case: 13-1626 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 11/25/2013
2 ZABLOSKY v. MIDFIRST BANK
This appeal involves an action by James and Karen Zablosky to halt foreclosure on property located at 187 Country View Lane, Floresville, Texas. The Zabloskys appeal. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not appear to include jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Rather, it appears the proper forum would be the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Additionally, on September 3, 2013, the Zabloskys filed with the district court a motion to with- draw their appeal, and thus it may be that it would be unnecessary to transfer this appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Absent objection received within 21 days of the date of this order, this appeal will be dismissed. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s25
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished