U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Searcy v. Agriculture

Searcy v. Agriculture
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided December 5, 2013

Searcy v. Agriculture

Opinion

Case: 13-3175 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 12/05/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANDREW SEARCY, JR., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent. ______________________ 2013-3175 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT4324120759-I-1. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Andrew Searcy, Jr. moves for “judgment based on respondent’s counsel fraud upon the court”.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion shall be deferred to the merits panel assigned to the case. A copy of the motions papers, any Case: 13-3175 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 12/05/2013

2 SEARCY v. AGRICULTURE

response, and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.