NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1183 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 10-CV-0015, Judge Jane A. Restani. ______________________

Decided: December 6, 2013 ______________________

FELICIA LEBORGNE NOWELS, Akerman Senterfitt, of Tallahassee, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were KATHERINE E. GIDDINGS, NANCY M. WALLACE, and MICHAEL J. LARSON.

MARCELLA POWELL, Trial Attorney, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of New York, New York, argued for the defend- ant-appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, of Washington, DC, and BARBARA 2 SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. US

S. WILLIAMS, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office of New York, New York. Of counsel on the brief was PAULA S. SMITH, Trial Attorney, Office of Assis- tant Chief Counsel, International Trade Litigation, Unit- ed States Customs and Border Protection, of New York, New York. ______________________

Before NEWMAN, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge. Samsung International, Inc. (Samsung) appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) that Samsung’s V3 and V4 Plasma Display Modules are “flat panel screen assemblies” classified under subheading 8529.90.53 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States. We adopt the reasoning of the CIT in all respects and therefore affirm. AFFIRMED