NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE SUK KAN OH (Real Party in Interest Zinus Inc.) ______________________

2013-1321 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 12/589,961. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DARIEN K. WALLACE, Imperium Patent Works LLP, of Pleasanton, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was T. LESTER WALLACE.

JAMIE L. SIMPSON, Associate Solicitor, Office of the So- licitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 6, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court