NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1277 ---------------------

OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1278 ---------------------

OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. 2 OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS V. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1279 ---------------------

OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DELL INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1280 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Nos. 12-CV-3125, 12- CV-3126, 12-CV-3127, and 12-CV-4999, Judge William H. Alsup. ______________________

Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM ORDER The judgments of non-infringement in favor of the de- fendant-appellees Hewlett-Packard Co., Sony Electronics, Inc., Lenovo, Inc., and Dell, Inc. are affirmed. We base our decision solely on our agreement with the district court’s construction of the phrase “wherein the power control means supply power to said memory integrated circuit.” Under the parties’ stipulation, our agreement with this aspect of the district court’s claim construction OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS V. HEWLETT-PACKARD 3 COMPANY

is sufficient to support the non-infringement judgment. We do not reach any other issues raised on appeal.

AFFIRMED

FOR THE COURT

December 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

cc: Bryan G. Harrison Paul Alexander