NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

AND

OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (doing business as Otterbox), Intervenor. ______________________

2013-1230 ______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-780. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

TERRY L. CLARK, Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant.

PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and SIDNEY A. ROSENWEIG, Acting Assistant General Counsel. Of counsel was WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Attorney.

LOUIS S. MASTRIANI, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaum- berg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were DANIEL F. SMITH and EVAN H. LANGDON. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court