Case: 13-7072 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

EUGENIO M. DELOS SANTOS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________

2013-7072 __________________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 11-632, Judge Kenneth B. Kra- mer. __________________________

ON MOTION __________________________

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to dismiss this appeal as untimely. On August 7, 2012, the United States Court of Ap- peals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) entered Case: 13-7072 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2013

EUGENIO DELOS SANTOS v. SHINSEKI 2

judgment in Eugenio M. Delos Santos’ case. According to the docket of the Veterans Court, the court received Santos’ notice of appeal on February 26, 2013, 203 days after the date of judgment. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed with the Veterans Court within 60 days of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court is jurisdictional and thus mandatory. Hender- son v. Shinseki, 131 S. Ct. 1197, 1204-05 (2011) (the language of Section 7292(a) “clearly signals an intent” to impose the same jurisdictional restrictions on an appeal from the Veterans Court to the Federal Circuit as im- posed on appeals from a district court to a court of ap- peals); see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007). Because Santos’ appeal as to the underlying judgment was filed outside of the statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court, we must dismiss the appeal. * Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

* The Secretary also correctly points out that Santos’ “motion for reconsideration” received by the Veterans Court on November 5, 2012 was untimely and does not toll the jurisdictional time period for appeal to this court. We agree. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) Case: 13-7072 Document: 6 Page: 3 Filed: 06/18/2013

3 EUGENIO DELOS SANTOS v. SHINSEKI

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 18, 2013