Michael Royster v. Marirosa Lamas
Opinion
Case: 13-1065 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtntteb ~tates qrourt of §ppeaIs for tbe jfeberaI qrtrcutt
MICHAEL ROYSTER,
Petitioner-Appellant, v.
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OF THE COUNTY OF S. WILLIAMS, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF,
Respondents-Appellees.
2013-1065
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in case no. 11-CV-0477, Chief Judge J. Curtis Joyner.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Having received no objection to this court's order dated December 3, 2012,
IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 13-1065 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 01/07/2013
MICHAEL ROYSTER V. MARIROSA LAMAS 2
(1) This appeal and any pending motions are trans- ferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s21
Issued As A Mandate: _......:J_A_N_O_1_2_01_3_ _
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.