U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. Pacific Diesel Brake Co.

Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. Pacific Diesel Brake Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 16, 2013

Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. Pacific Diesel Brake Co.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JACOBS VEHICLE EQUIPMENT CO., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant- Cross Appellant, AND

DANAHER CORPORATION, Counterclaim Defendant- Cross Appellant, V.

PACIFIC DIESEL BRAKE COMPANY AND SHARLAMEN HOLDINGS, LTD., Defendants-Appellants, AND

JENARA ENTERPRISES, LTD., Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellant. ____________________ 2012-1193, -1194 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in case No. 93-CV-1093, Judge Robert N. Chatigny. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PATRICK J. COYNE, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-cross appellants. Of counsel on the brief were CHRISTOPHER B. MEAD, London and Mead, of Washington, DC, and MARK L. AUSTRIAN, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC.

JOSEPH W. BERENATO, III, Berenato & White, LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland, argued for defendants appellants/counterclaimant appellant. With him on the brief was DAVID S. TAYLOR. Of counsel was MATTHEW STAVISH, ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.