Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics
Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wntteb ~tate~ C!Court of ~peal~ for tbe jfeberal C!Ctrcutt APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees.
AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.
2012-1172
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2
ON MOTION
ORDER AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corpora- tion America move without opposition to substitute Law- rence J. Gotts as principal counsel. Terrence D. Garnett will continue to serve as counsel.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Lawrence J. Gotts and Ter- rence D. Garnett should promptly file new entries of appearance.
FOR THE COURT
FEB 0 ' 2013 Is/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq.
Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. FILED .
Donald R. McPhail, Esq. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FO•• THE FFilFP:":.1. r~:::r.tnT Lawrence J. Gotts, Esq.
FEB 0 7 20U s21 JANHORBAlv CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.