Mondis Tech v. Hon Hai Precision
Mondis Tech v. Hon Hai Precision
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., ALSO KNOWN AS FOXCONN INNOLUX DISPLAY CORP., LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP., LITE-ON TRADING USA, INC., TPV TECHNOLOGY, LTD., INNOLUX CORP., AND CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS INNOLUX DISPLAY CORPORATION, Defendants,
AND
TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC., TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., AND TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO. LTD., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________
2012-1208 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 07-CV-0565 and 08- CV- 0478, Judge Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and Vincent A. Gallo.
JONATHAN D. HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was JOSHUA DEAHL. Of counsel on the brief were MARK A. SAMUELS and BRIAN BERLINER, of Los Angeles, California, and MICHAEL L. MYERS of Newport Beach, California. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 20, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished