U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Roaqin v. Shinseki

Roaqin v. Shinseki
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided February 27, 2013

Roaqin v. Shinseki

Opinion

Case: 12-7049 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 02/27/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ VICTORIA A. ROAQUIN, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________ 2012-7049 __________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-2917, Judge John J.

Farley, III. __________________________ ON MOTION __________________________ ORDER The court construes Victoria A. Roaquin’s filing as a motion to obtain counsel.

This court has no procedure to appoint counsel for pro se litigants. Mrs. Roaquin is advised that pro bono counsel may be available to veterans for representation at this court through various assistance programs, including the Case: 12-7049 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 02/27/2013

VICTORIA ROAQUIN V. SHINSEKI 2

Federal Circuit Bar Association’s Veterans Pro Bono Program.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that Mrs. Roaquin is given 60 days from the date of this order to obtain counsel. If no counsel is obtained the case will proceed as per the court’s normal schedule.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.