Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft
Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ACTSOFT, INC., OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________
2012-1066 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and 08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PHILIP S. LORENZO and JAMES E. DALLNER. KYLE B. FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TODD R. TUCKER and NICHOLAS J. GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 1, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished