Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ACTSOFT, INC., OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

2012-1066 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and 08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PHILIP S. LORENZO and JAMES E. DALLNER. KYLE B. FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TODD R. TUCKER and NICHOLAS J. GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 1, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished