Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided May 13, 2013 · Malley, Schall, Wallach
504 F. App'x 922

Counsel

Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were David T. Pritikin, William H. Baumgart-ner, Jr., and Anthony Balkissoon. Of counsel was Linda R. Friedlieb., Matthew M. Wolf, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Edward Han, John E. Nilsson and Seth I. Heller.

Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the district court without opinion. We vacate, however, the portion of the district court’s decision “nullifying” (invalidating) dependent claims 14-16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,547,817. See Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp., 868 F.Supp.2d 342, 356-57 (D.Del. 2012).

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.