NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MICHAEL R. LANGE, AND SKY ROBOTICS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

MARK A. LITMAN, AND MARK A. LITMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Defendants-Appellees,

AND

IPC EAGLE, INC., Defendant. ______________________

2012-1565 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 11-CV-2387, Judge Donovan W. Frank. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

Before DYK, MAYER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER 2 MICHAEL R. LANGE v. MARK A. LITMAN On March 11, 2013, appellees Mark A. Litman and Mark A. Litman & Associates filed a motion seeking reversal without oral argument and a remand with in- structions to dismiss the plaintiff’s malpractice claims for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants Michael R. Lange and Sky Robotics, Inc., opposed. IT IS ORDERED THAT: In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 1059 (2013), we conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the mal- practice claims at issue. We vacate the district court’s decision and remand to the district court. On remand the district court shall dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction. FOR THE COURT

March 27, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Paul A. Sortland, Esq. Charles E. Lundberg, Esq.