Hunt v. Shinseki
Hunt v. Shinseki
Opinion
Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________
ANTHONY G. HUNT, Claimant-Appellant,
v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________
2012-7039 __________________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4707, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel. __________________________
ON MOTION __________________________
ORDER
Anthony G. Hunt moves to supplement his brief with further points and authorities, which he also refers to as a motion for mandamus. Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 04/04/2013
HUNT v. SHINSEKI 2
Mr. Hunt’s motion provides additional arguments re- garding the merits of his case. We deem it the best course to treat his motion as a supplement to his brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to supplement his brief is granted. A copy of Mr. Hunt’s supplemental brief will be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.
FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk
s24
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished