U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Hunt v. Shinseki

Hunt v. Shinseki
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided April 4, 2013
Hunt v. Shinseki

Opinion

Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ ANTHONY G. HUNT, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________ 2012-7039 __________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4707, Judge Lawrence B.

Hagel. __________________________ ON MOTION __________________________ ORDER Anthony G. Hunt moves to supplement his brief with further points and authorities, which he also refers to as a motion for mandamus.

Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 04/04/2013

HUNT v. SHINSEKI 2 Mr. Hunt’s motion provides additional arguments re- garding the merits of his case. We deem it the best course to treat his motion as a supplement to his brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion to supplement his brief is granted. A copy of Mr. Hunt’s supplemental brief will be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s24

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.