U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2013

Glenn Connery v. Laurence Boucher

Glenn Connery v. Laurence Boucher
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided April 9, 2013

Glenn Connery v. Laurence Boucher

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLENN W. CONNERY, GARY JASZEWSKI, AND RICHARD REID, Appellants, v. LAURENCE B. BOUCHER, STEPHEN E.

BLIGHTMAN, PETER K. CRAFT, DAVID A.

HIGGEN, CLIVE M. PHILBRICK, AND DARYL D.

STARR, Appellees. ______________________ 2012-1612 (Interference No. 105,775) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ HECTOR J. RIBERA, Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were LYNN H. PASAHOW and CAROLYN CHANG.

THOMAS W. LATHRAM, Silicon Edge Law Group, LLP, of Pleasanton, California, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was MARK A. LAUER. Of counsel was CHARLES L. GHOLZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, of Alexandria, Virginia. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 9, 2013 /s/ Jan Horblay Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.