Deep9 Corp. v. Barnes & Noble
Deep9 Corp. v. Barnes & Noble
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DEEP9 CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2013-1031 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 11-CV-0035, Judge James L. Robart. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Of counsel on the brief were ERIC B. FASTIFF and DAVID T.
RUDOLPH, Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, of San Francisco, California; and KIM D. STEPHENS and CHASE ALVORD, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, of Seat- tle, Washington.
JOHN B. QUINN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants- appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DAVID EISEMAN and JEFFREY S. GERCHICK, of Washington, DC; and MELISSA J. BAILY, of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.