Randall Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
Randall Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RANDALL S. ASHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1043 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 10-CV-1468, Judge Marcia S.
Krieger. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM W. COCHRAN, II, Cochran Freund & Yong, of Fort Collins, Colorado and GORDON M. HADFIELD, Fischer & Fischer, LLP, of Fort Collins, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was ERIK G. FISCHER, Erik G. Fischer, P.C., of Fort Collins, Colorado.
DAVID K. CALLAHAN, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chica- go, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JARED BARCENAS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 29, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.